A A A

Please consider registering
guest

Log In Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —

  

— Match —

   

— Forum Options —

   

Minimum search word length is 4 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Topic RSS
Venice Stakeholders Press Release Questions Rosendahl's Press Release
Read the original blog post
Topic Rating: 4Topic Rating: 4Topic Rating: 4Topic Rating: 4Topic Rating: 4 Topic Rating: 4 (58 votes) 
May 16, 2012
9:11 pm
Bret
Venice
Admin
Forum Posts: 8421
Member Since:
June 20, 2007
Offline
1
4.3

The Venice Stakeholders Association issued a press release today which questions Councilman Bill Rosendahl's press release from May 2nd regarding the homeless encampment on 3rd street, aka the nationally discussed "Skid Rose".

Venice Stakeholders Association

From The Venice Stakeholders Association:

The Venice Stakeholders Association today released an opinion letter from a leading First Amendment attorney that concludes that Councilman Bill Rosendahl misled his constituents when he claimed that: “The Ninth Circuit Court has ruled that people or organizations have a First Amendment right to distribute free food.” The councilman made the statement in a “FAQ” (frequently asked questions) on May 2, 2012.

The opinion letter, prepared by attorney Gary Bostwick (attached), concludes: “Our opinion is that the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has never ‘ruled that people or organizations have a First Amendment right to distribute free food’ as he states. The fact that there is no basis for the Statement is admitted by the City Attorney’s Office.”

Rosendahl’s FAQ also says that “During litigation … the court insisted that the City set aside two spaces on Ocean Front Walk for food distribution. We are legally required to do that …” In fact, the City was never ordered by any court to set aside spaces for food distribution. Rather, the City (with Rosendahl leading the way) agreed voluntarily to bind itself to do so in a settlement agreement with the plaintiffs in the case, and then amended its sidewalk vending ordinance (L.A.M.C. section 42.15) to set aside the spaces.

“Rosendahl gave that away because he’s stuck in a 1950s social worker mindset about how you help the poor, not because any ruling, holding or order by any court ever required such action or held that there is a First Amendment right to distribute free food on public property,” VSA president Ryavec said.

“With this revelation we renew our call for Rosendahl to amend the vending ordinance to remove these public food giveaway stations,” Ryavec said. “It’s not an accident that Santa Monica ended its public feeding programs years ago; these stations are dysfunctional, enable people to stay in squalid conditions, and act as a magnet.”

Ryavec noted that after seven years in office, Rosendahl has yet to put in place effective programs to help the poor get off the street and into housing.

“Bill’s spent a lot of time getting his picture taken, but that doesn’t seem to have resulted in a decrease in our transient population,” Ryavec said. “And in that population we have witnessed murderers, rapists, muggers, burglars and thieves. The residents are really done with the risks to life, limb and property this population represents.”

Attachment: Opinion Letter from Gary Bostwick to Venice Stakeholders Association

May 17, 2012
6:18 am
jimmydale
Member
Forum Posts: 460
Member Since:
February 14, 2010
Offline
2
4.3

VSH states the issues well and in one paints the most disturbing  “Bill’s spent a lot of time getting his picture taken, but that doesn’t seem to have resulted in a decrease in our transient population,” Ryavec said. “And in that population we have witnessed murderers, rapists, muggers, burglars and thieves. The residents are really done with the risks to life, limb and property this population represents aspect."

But, we are again running around in circles and always the name Rosendahl pops up as an obstructionist as we sprint round and round the circle. Our lack luster so called leader, is a huge part of our problem and may in fact be the problem toward achieving a safer, saner community. 

May 17, 2012
7:25 am
Venice Rob
Member
Forum Posts: 1462
Member Since:
January 20, 2012
Offline
3
4.3

Lack of leadership maybe the tip of the iceberg. It's time to follow the money.

May 17, 2012
7:39 am
jimmydale
Member
Forum Posts: 460
Member Since:
February 14, 2010
Offline
4
4

I agree Venice Rob and perhaps VCHC and others can be looked at more closely and see if we can uncover any public records on the financials of VCHC such as income, property owned, payroll, who is paid, how much, who and how many are served, or not,by them. They are a non profit receiving both private and public income and I believe their records have to be made available to the public and that public disclosure is part and parcel of the non profit sector. Perhaps even determine if any questionable financial collaboration between VCHC and the mayor and council office.

May 17, 2012
8:18 am
Shane
Member
Forum Posts: 2146
Member Since:
June 16, 2009
Offline
5
4.2

Rosendahl should be removed from office. He no longer represents the majority of Venetians and is acting on his own behalf.

May 17, 2012
9:37 am
concernedneighbor
Member
Forum Posts: 437
Member Since:
April 13, 2012
Offline
6
3.7

It's a puppet regime - Swami X is pulling the strings...

'...and you sir are no Sonny Zorro!' -AnotherWorldView
May 17, 2012
10:48 am
Venice Vortex
Member
Forum Posts: 258
Member Since:
November 10, 2011
Offline
7
4

A politicians job is easy.  They just have to represent their Constituents.  Bill instead is pushing his agenda that damages the quality of life of the people that voted for him.  Lets prey that he does not get reelected.

May 17, 2012
10:54 am
Maisie538
Member
Forum Posts: 89
Member Since:
August 2, 2010
Offline
8
3

When is he up for reelection, and is VSA or any other entity going to lead the charge to vote him out of office? Is there a term limit on his seat?

May 17, 2012
11:06 am
venicestakeholders
Rialto Avenue
Member
Forum Posts: 432
Member Since:
February 24, 2010
Offline
9
4

His second term is up June 30th of next year.  He has announced that he is running for one more four year term.  The VSA, as a non-profit, cannot be engaged in electoral politics.  Some of us as individuals may be active in supporting another candidate if someone qualified steps forward.  Mark

May 17, 2012
1:02 pm
Venetian
Yo! Puppy!
Member
Forum Posts: 1874
Member Since:
June 17, 2009
Offline
10
3.7

Even if Rosendahl is voted out there is every likelihood that Bonin (the puppet master) will remain to ensure Venice continues to get violated. The whole eleventh district regime needs to be removed and carefully replaced if we want to see any lasting positive change in Venice.  

"I am now aiming precisely at your groin. So speak now or forever hold your piece." – James Bond
May 17, 2012
2:27 pm
Maisie538
Member
Forum Posts: 89
Member Since:
August 2, 2010
Offline
11
3.7

I had to look up Bonin to determine that he's Mike Bonin, Rosendahl's chief of staff. I imagine that if there is a viable candidate who is opposed to Rosendahl's legacy, Bonin will have to seek influence elsewhere. Change is possible. I hate it when people say that even if we try to make changes everything will stay the same—it's really disheartening.

May 17, 2012
2:32 pm
jimmydale
Member
Forum Posts: 460
Member Since:
February 14, 2010
Offline
12
5

okay Mark are you going to run to be our effective leader in CD 11?

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Most Users Ever Online: wp_sferrorlog

Currently Online:
37 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 32

Members: 19908

Moderators: 2

Admins: 8

Forum Stats:

Groups: 8

Forums: 37

Topics: 8809

Posts: 63411

Newest Members: Marian7173

Moderators: ModBot: 11, CanalsAdjacent: 0

Administrators: Bret: 8421, EmilGH: 108, eric: 263, Mick: 281, Brenton: 18, Parimal Rohit: 12, Corina Mun: 5, Yo Venice Staff: 78