Yo! Venice! Venice Beach, California

Forum

A A A

Please consider registering
guest

Log In Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search:

— Forum Scope —



— Match —



— Forum Options —




Wildcard usage:
*  matches any number of characters    %  matches exactly one character

Minimum search word length is 4 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Topic RSS
Cell Phone Tower Protest on Washington
Read the original blog post
Topic Rating: 3.7Topic Rating: 3.7Topic Rating: 3.7Topic Rating: 3.7Topic Rating: 3.7 Topic Rating: 3.7 (33 votes) 
June 14, 2012
6:27 pm
Shane
Member
Forum Posts: 1809
Member Since:
June 16, 2009
Offline
13
3

Why not add the tower to the Zipline?

June 15, 2012
12:06 am
Venetian
Yo! Puppy!
Member
Forum Posts: 1751
Member Since:
June 17, 2009
Offline
14
0

Odd. I've never had a problem with cell coverage anywhere in Venice. If I did I would probably just change carriers. If we do have to have a new cell tower, for people who can't be bothered to just change carriers, then I'm with Shane on killing two birds with one stone and building just one ugly cellular zipline tower rather than several ugly towers all over the place. 

"I am now aiming precisely at your groin. So speak now or forever hold your piece." – James Bond
June 15, 2012
12:18 am
Bret
Venice
Admin
Forum Posts: 7597
Member Since:
June 20, 2007
Offline
15
0

AT&T is non existent at Rose and Ocean Front Walk, I don't have problems anywhere else.

June 15, 2012
12:22 am
Venetian
Yo! Puppy!
Member
Forum Posts: 1751
Member Since:
June 17, 2009
Offline
16
0

Bret said
AT&T is non existent at Rose and Ocean Front Walk, I don't have problems anywhere else.

But hasn't AT&T pretty much always been the suck? Why not just change carriers? 

"I am now aiming precisely at your groin. So speak now or forever hold your piece." – James Bond
June 15, 2012
1:12 am
Bret
Venice
Admin
Forum Posts: 7597
Member Since:
June 20, 2007
Offline
17
0

Venetian said

Bret said
AT&T is non existent at Rose and Ocean Front Walk, I don't have problems anywhere else.

But hasn't AT&T pretty much always been the suck? Why not just change carriers? 

I was TMobile until iPhone came out, now I am out of contract and will decide when the next gen phones come out.

June 15, 2012
6:53 am
not native
Member
Forum Posts: 1613
Member Since:
September 2, 2010
Offline
18
0

I live very near the proposed site and when I had an iPhone on ATT, I could not get 3G coverage, which is weird because they have a large store on Lincoln and it always worked there, not 3 blocks away. I switched carriers and all is well but I'd guess others in the area did as well, hence their desire to boost their signal here. From what I've seen, they could have done this under cover of darkness and nobody would have ever noticed.

Campers belong in a campground.
June 15, 2012
9:31 am
concernedneighbor
Member
Forum Posts: 346
Member Since:
April 13, 2012
Offline
19
5

If you stop into an ATT store and complain about your signal at your house they will give you a free micro cell that routes your calls through your wifi connection – problem solved.  My biggest pain with ATT is that there is no coverage in any buildings West of main – my guess is that it's a combination of the angle from the tower and the composition of the buildings – neither of which will be helped much by a new tower.  I'm not against better reception – but if it was next to my house I might be worried about potential effects of long term exposure to the high power signals – remember when people thought smoking was cool…

'...and you sir are no Sonny Zorro!' -AnotherWorldView
June 15, 2012
9:46 am
not native
Member
Forum Posts: 1613
Member Since:
September 2, 2010
Offline
20
0

concernedneighbor said
If you stop into an ATT store and complain about your signal at your house they will give you a free micro cell that routes your calls through your wifi connection – problem solved.  

That's new. I asked for something along those lines and was laughed at by ATT tech. I guess enough people bailed on their 3G  service to make that possible.

Campers belong in a campground.
June 22, 2012
12:38 pm
Bret
Venice
Admin
Forum Posts: 7597
Member Since:
June 20, 2007
Offline
21
0

From the Triangle Update:

 

The Washington Blvd “No-Cell-Tower” group won their appeal at the West Los Angeles Area Planning Commission (WLAPC) Wednesday.  The WLAPC decision is non-appealable. If they want to fight, they would have to file a lawsuit according to Agnes Huff, one of the organizers.

            AT&T was granted the right to build a tower at 737 Washington Blvd by Los Angeles Planning Department last year.  A group of neighbors centering around Washington Blvd, headed by Agnes Huff and Mark Shockley, decided to appeal the planning decision.

            The Venice Neighborhood Council (VNC) at their meet Tuesday voted to recommend that there be a moratorium on all cell towers in Venice until there is further study to develop a cooperative solution.

            “It was magic,” wrote Agnes.  “This effort was a community quilt – each of us responsible for just one square to complete it and last night, we saw that everyone had a square, each important – that when woven together, covered every aspect of our community voice.  Everyone in the community deserves a heartfelt thanks and recognition that without all of us together, we would not have been able to prevent AT&T from installing a cell tower by our houses.

            “The consultant, Ted Kreines of Kreines & Kreines was invaluable. Without Ted's report and providing us with solid evidence, we would not have had a good chance to prevail.

            “What gave me a lot of hope was a link supplied by Maria Shen of Marr.  This should give all cell fighters hope.”  http://www.celltowerdangers.or…..owers.html